Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. Although the Motorola One Hyper and Motorola One Action were only released with a few months difference, the Motorola One Hyper body is a little bit thinner but heavier. The Motorola One Action features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper takes much better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola One Action features as much storage capacity for apps and games as the Motorola One Hyper one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.