Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, with an 87 score against 79.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design is newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than Motorola One Hyper. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Hyper has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger display, a bit better screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola One Hyper has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.