Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design has the same thickness than Motorola One Hyper, but it is heavier.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper and Nokia 8 V 5G UW feature extremely similar screens, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger diafragm aperture and better video frame rates. Motorola One Hyper has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB, the Motorola One Hyper also has 128 GB internal storage.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.