Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. The Motorola One Hyper construction is newer than Nokia 9 PureView's, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper captures much better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with greater battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola One Hyper is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.