Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 80.8 score against 79.8. The Nokia XR20 design is newer than Motorola One Hyper's, but it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you identical operating system features.
The Nokia XR20 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nokia XR20 counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.