Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 79.8 score against 75.8. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola One Hyper body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were only released 2 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola One Hyper features a bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a way worse 48 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.