Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a 79.8 score against 76.2. Although Motorola One Hyper is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a little worse display density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a quite larger display. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola One Hyper is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.