Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a 79.9 score against 79.8. The Galaxy A25 5G body is a lot newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same amount of pixels in each inch of display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a display of the same size. Motorola One Hyper features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with longer battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola One Hyper has a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.