Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30, with a global score of 79.8 against 79.6. Motorola One Hyper is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A30, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in Motorola One Hyper, because although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Motorola One Hyper shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A30, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A30's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola One Hyper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.