Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Galaxy A5 (2017), with a overall score of 79.8 against 75.8. The Motorola One Hyper design is newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A5 (2017). The Motorola One Hyper features a little faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.