Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a general score of 83.8 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Hyper, even when both were released only 9 months apart. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a little better pixels amount in each screen inch. Motorola One Hyper counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a battery life that is very similar to Motorola One Hyper's battery duration. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a camera with much more megapixels.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.