Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having an 86.6 score against 79.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Even when the Galaxy A50s and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A50s is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. The Motorola One Hyper has a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A50s features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Motorola One Hyper. Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera in the back, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and a worse (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.