Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both devices we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although Samsung Galaxy A51 and Motorola One Hyper were only released 1 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A51 is thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A51 has a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A51 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite higher screen pixel density.
Motorola One Hyper features a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51's battery life is very similar to the battery life in Motorola One Hyper.
Galaxy A51 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a tinier aperture, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a way lower 48 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.