Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a 90.8 score against 79.8. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS. Even when Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One Hyper were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A51 5G is a little lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit better pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a much less megapixels back-facing camera, a worse video quality and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited environments. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to Motorola One Hyper's one, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same internal memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.