Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 90.7 against 79.8. The Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Hyper. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A52 also has a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.