Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a 91.3 score against 79.8. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it's also a little lighter and a little thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.