Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Galaxy A6, having a score of 79.8 against 75.8. Motorola One Hyper's body is newer than Galaxy A6's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola One Hyper features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola One Hyper also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a greater screen pixel density and a larger display. Motorola One Hyper takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.