Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features and performance improvements. The Motorola One Hyper is a thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
Galaxy A70 features a display that is very similar to Motorola One Hyper's screen, because although the Galaxy A70 has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A70 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. The Motorola One Hyper has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola One Hyper is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.