Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than the Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's memory for games and applications is very similar to the Motorola One Hyper one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.