Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a display that's very similar to the Motorola One Hyper one, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a quite smaller display, a bit lower pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2220px resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.