Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer than the Motorola One Hyper's, although it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy F62 has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 has just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy F62 has a way better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.