Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a score of 87.7 against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is newer, but a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Hyper. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a display that is just as good as Motorola One Hyper's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola One Hyper features a bit more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy M51 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.