Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 90.8 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than Motorola One Hyper, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has an 8 percent more battery size. Motorola One Hyper shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with way more MP and better 30 fps video frame rate.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.