Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a just a bit inferior pixel number per display inch and a quite smaller display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.