Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a 79.8 score against 79.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Motorola One Hyper construction is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, although it is heavier and thicker.
Galaxy Note 5 has a more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Hyper features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores.
Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.