Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 80.4 score against 79.8. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Hyper, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.