Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola One Hyper, having a overall score of 89 against 79.8. Although the Galaxy Note10 and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Note10 is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel count in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has a little better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.