Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a a little lighter and just a little bit thinner device than Motorola One Hyper, although both of them were released only 2 months apart.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy Note10 Lite's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Motorola One Hyper one, both of them have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and the same internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.