Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note3's score of 77.7. These devices include Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. Motorola One Hyper's design is newer than Galaxy Note3's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
Motorola One Hyper has a little better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cores (although slower) and 1 GB more RAM. Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little greater pixel number per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Motorola One Hyper shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
Motorola One Hyper features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.