Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, so it gives you some extra features and performance tweaks. Even though Galaxy Note8 is extremely older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Galaxy Note8 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note8 costs more money than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.