Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Galaxy S10 is an older cellphone than Motorola One Hyper, but it is notably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Galaxy S10 features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 counts with a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Motorola One Hyper captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.