Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Galaxy S10 5G is a a little lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola One Hyper, even though both of them were released only 7 months apart. These devices use the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040, a higher pixels density and a little bit larger display. Motorola One Hyper shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.