Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 350.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little lighter and a little thinner phone than the Motorola One Hyper, even though they were released with only 2 months difference. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S10 Lite's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola One Hyper one, both have the same internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a lot worse 48 MP resolution. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.