Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with a score of 86.3 against 79.8. Galaxy S10e is an older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but it is thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola One Hyper has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more money than the Motorola One Hyper, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.