Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. The Galaxy S20 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Hyper, even when both were only released 3 months apart. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with higher video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Galaxy S20's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Motorola One Hyper one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and equal internal storage.
The Galaxy S20's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Motorola One Hyper.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.