Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola One Hyper.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola One Hyper both count with really similar storage to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.