Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a 98 score against 79.8. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a bit heavier device than the Motorola One Hyper, but both of them have the same thickness.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite larger screen and a greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Motorola One Hyper's one, both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and equal internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way higher resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.