Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S21 FE's body is a lot newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper. Galaxy S21 FE features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Motorola One Hyper features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.