Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a 95.4 score against 79.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than Motorola One Hyper, but both are 0.35inches thick.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a quite larger display, a greater count of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.