Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 design is incredibly lighter and way thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola One Hyper features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25's battery duration is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola One Hyper.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way better video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.