Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola One Hyper.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger display.
Motorola One Hyper counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a camera with a much higher 200 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.