Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. The Motorola One Hyper is a noticeably heavier device than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has the previous 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43% more battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way better 64 MP resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more money than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.