Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-12-04 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The Galaxy S6 Active features a more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a way better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher pixels density. Motorola One Hyper counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.9 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels. Motorola One Hyper has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S6 Active is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.