Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. The Motorola One Hyper design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy S7 has a much sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola One Hyper features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.