Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Motorola One Hyper body is extremely newer and thinner, but a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more processing cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola One Hyper features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola One Hyper's battery life. Motorola One Hyper captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S7 Active, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.