Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge, with a overall score of 79.8 against 78.1. The Motorola One Hyper is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's heavier and thicker. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has more cores. The Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Motorola One Hyper costs a little more than the Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.