Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. The Galaxy S8 construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola One Hyper, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy S8 features a brighter screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S8 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S8 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.