Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 81.9 against 79.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy S8 Active construction is notably older, thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola One Hyper. Galaxy S8 Active has a much better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola One Hyper has a superior camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S8 Active has a battery performance that's very similar to Motorola One Hyper's battery duration.
Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.