Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the Motorola One Hyper, it must be noted that it's also a incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker phone.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.