Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting an 81 score against 79.8. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so they should give you all the same OS features. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover Pro is an a bit heavier and thicker phone than the Motorola One Hyper.
Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a quite greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera. The Motorola One Hyper features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.